Archive for January, 2010

Seth’s Blog: Quieting the lizard brain
January 28, 2010

Time to kill the Lizard. Great read.

One of my all time favorite books discusses this as well.

Posted via web from Color and Voice


Apple – iPad – The best way to experience the web, email, & photos
January 27, 2010

The iPad Laddies and Gentelman
January 27, 2010

gapingvoid love gallery
January 27, 2010

I want any one of these. Can’t wait till I can afford to buy art. There is so much great stuff out.

Posted via web from Color and Voice

The 100 Cheesiest Movie Quotes of All Time
January 21, 2010

Death Metal Rooster
January 12, 2010

I don’t know why, I just love this.

Posted via web from Color and Voice

Followbase – Customer service & support via Twitter
January 7, 2010

Help your customers – by providing a real-time Twitter based customer service & support forum. Answer questions, gather ideas, solve problems and stay connected.

Customization – customize your Followbase forum to give it your own look & feel, upload your company brand logo and select the customer service topics.

Moderation – move tweets around from topic to topic, bury irelevant tweets or blacklist spammers and bots.

Add employees – as support reps to your company team.

Employee identification – all employee tweets are marked “team” and replies are highlighted.

Threaded replies – quick and easy to find replies and to see which tweets were answered.

This looks fantastic. So excited to try it out! Service for monitoring Twitter conversations for businesses.

Posted via web from Color and Voice

Nothing like testing right? I need an alternative to the JAWS Screen Reader. Suggestions?
January 6, 2010

I may have to bite the bullet and buy the REALLY ($1000 +) expensive
screen reader. But does anyone have any alternatives that they can
recommend? Free or otherwise?

Posted via email from Color and Voice

Eyetracking Web Usability – review : Cennydd Bowles on user experience
January 6, 2010

Time to pick sides: Jakob Nielsen has written an eyetracking book. I can scarcely think of a more divisive pairing: mention either within earshot of a UX aficionado and you’re in for impassioned advocacy or scornful ridicule. Me? I’ll confess both subject and author have left me unconvinced in the past, but I approached Nielsen and co-author Kara Pernice’s new book with curiosity and as objective an outlook as I could muster.

Eyetracking Web Usability is the outcome of the largest eyetracking study ever undertaken: 1.5 million fixations from 300 participants. Nielsen and Pernice are clearly keen to stress the magnitude and legitimacy of their research. Their test script, posted in full, is well considered and comprehensive, covering a range of tasks representative of real web use.

After a brief recap of eye physiology and saccades, the book begins in earnest with a detailed breakdown of research methods. Findings then stretch across chapters discussing specific web elements in turn: navigation, forms, images and so on. At their best, these chapters reveal flashes of usefulness. A chart of eye fixations versus layout density shows minimal correlation, demonstrating that busy pages simply dilute attention from the most important information. The book also touches on the important role of information scent and microcopy, declaring insightfully that “a link is a promise”.

In typical Nielsen style the text is heavily punctuated by summary boxes. Sadly, it quickly becomes apparent that these make the point just as effectively as the full text. Eyetracking Web Usability is all fat, no meat. Wasted space includes a page on why a 7-point Likert scale is better than a 5-point one, and five pages on male users’ propensity to fixate on dog genitals. The writing, meanwhile, veers from redundant to simply cringeworthy: “Give that Wii a rest, and go prioritise your Web page layout design. You can do it!”

A chapter on adverts (whose raison d’être is of course to attract the eye) starts promisingly. An ad has a 36% chance of being seen by a user, a figure surprisingly unaffected by user task. However, it soon descends into known generalities: banner blindness and users’ dislike of irrelevant advertising. The chapter encapsulates Eyetracking Web Usability’s main shortcoming. Eyetracking demands specificity: carefully planned tasks on an individual site. Nielsen and Pernice’s 300-person test can only dilute potentially salient points into generalisations that even a novice designer will already know. The conclusions cover ground so well trodden as to be barren.

Despite the authors’ focus on rigour and transparency, serious concerns surround the research methods themselves. Heatmaps from the tests are dated from late 2005. With lab time accounting for five months, the study was therefore complete by summer 2006. Why then was this book not published until the brink of 2010? It is hard to avoid the impression that the results sat untouched for years and were subsequently rushed out in a lull of client work. Eyetracking Web Usability also misses a huge opportunity by focusing solely on informational websites. Web apps are discounted since eyetracking can’t handle dynamic elements, including Ajax and even dropdowns. The results are thus only valid for an increasingly small part of the UX designer’s 2010 workload.

Most worryingly of all, it seems that the tests were conducted in Internet Explorer 6. Browser does not appear to have been offered to users, and where browser chrome is shown (it is stripped in the vast majority of the heatmaps), it is unmistakeably IE6. If this is indeed the case, it nullifies many findings since the primary browser innovation of the 2000s – the tab – is unavailable. In IE6 a link is an entirely binary choice: go there, or stay here. Modern browsers allow an important new behaviour: Open In New Tab, creating tentative and plural navigation steps. It’s likely Nielsen’s participants relied far more on the Back button and their short-term memory than today’s users. Their search engine use is also likely to be different, since IE6 lacks an inbuilt search box in the UI.

Eyetracking Web Usability thus lacks the rigour required to be taken seriously as an empirical work; however, its adherence to factual reportage make it a chore to read. Even the most ardent enthusiast will skip over paragraphs that merely disclose participant actions in minute detail. It’s sixth form science at best; utterly literal, over-eager for the praise of the adjudicators. The effect is exacerbated by the disappointingly scant acknowledgment of others’ work. Few external insights or breakthroughs are admitted, although NN/g reports are of course suggested as ways for the reader to supplement his knowledge.

The book’s conclusion will come as no surprise to the reader. “Eyetracking fills in the details… Most companies should not bother conducting their own eyetracking studies.” It is hard to disagree. The book does nothing for the eyetracking industry except cement its status as an expensive diversion; the excessive cover price of £44 only reinforces this. If this is the accumulated wisdom of the largest eyetracking survey in history, we can safely consider the technology inconsequential.

Remember those design principles you learned ten years ago? Eyetracking shows they’re right. Carry on.

I have to admit, I often have a hard time with Jakob Nielsen as well. Well, not with Neilsen per se, but with how badly he is often misquoted and by relying on old studies that don’t include current trends. The review above hits on this hard. Looks like I’ll be missing this read.

Posted via web from Color and Voice

Travis Pastrana 2010 Red Bull New Year No Limits 269 ft World Record Jump! (The whole thing!)
January 5, 2010


Posted via web from Color and Voice